Entry tags:
Feminism: Why Insane Radicals Shouldn't Be Allowed in the Club
I haven't posted in a few days, but it wasn't because I was striking (I'm still not even sure what that whole thing is about). I just didn't have much to say. But I do now.
This post was brought to my attention recently, and I'm really having a hard time keeping my mouth shut. For those of you who can't be arsed into reading it, basically this woman, a radical feminist, claims that Firefly is anti-feminist and that Joss Whedon is a rapist.
I'm sure you're expecting me to be up in arms over her insulting Joss or something, but honestly, I couldn't care less about that aspect of it. What I take issue with is her definition of rape:
As someone who was violently raped when she was eight years old, I am offended at her definition of rape. If "Oh, honey, not tonight...well, okay," is considered rape, then we're going to have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me and what happens to millions of other women around the world.
I posted a response to her post, but she has her journal set to screen comments until she chooses to unscreen them, so I am posting my reply here on this journal as well because I am so...unbelievably offended and angry right now that I feel like I have to do something.
Please know that while I am a Joss Whedon fan, I am not making this comment as someone who is trying to defend his work. I am making this comment as someone who was raped when she was eight years old by her older brother.
I won't go into the details of what happened to me, but it was violent, it was against my will, and though I tried to stop it, I couldn't. It was the most helpless and, more importantly, hopeless that I have ever felt in my life. I wouldn't wish that feeling on anyone in this world, man, woman, or gender neutral.
What happened to me was rape.
Your definition of rape:
While I respect that you have the right to believe this, I have to say that as someone who was a rape victim, I am offended by it.
There is a very large difference between what happened to me and the things that happen to other rape victims that are even worse, and "No, honey, not tonight…well, all right." Do you see the difference?
What your definition of rape does is trivialize what happened to me and other victims around the world. If that is rape, then you'd have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me.
I'm not going to try and persuade you to change your mind, because it seems quite clear that you have formed your own opinions and don't intend to change, but as a victim of rape, I am appalled and offended at your definition of rape, and the subsequent trivialization of my experience that it causes.
I'm not trying to start drama or whatever, but as someone who was a victim of sexual assault, I feel like...like I have to say something to this girl, or no one else will.
And what's more, she's saying that any male/female sex is rape, just by definition. And that it is impossible for a woman to love a man without it being degradation.
Sorry, but that's bullshit.
And don't even get me started on how she claims that no white man can be in a relationship with a black woman without abusing her. Racist, much?
The real gem is when she insists that Joss's wife must only be staying around for the money or "patriarchal concepts of love," but money isn't as important as, "self-integrity, self-esteem, love (sister/lesbian/gynaffectionate love), etc." She's basically saying that the only valid love is between two women, and that male/female love doesn't exist.
It's women like her that give actual feminism--which is about equality, not man-hating--a bad name.
I'm sorry, I realize this post is long and preachy, but as someone who is a victim of rape, I am offended and enraged by her comments, and I couldn't not say something about it.
P.S. I'm making this post public, because I'm not going to be accused of hiding behind a friendslock. If someone wants to argue with me, then bring it.
Edit: Hahaha! Looks like someone isn't above lolcating this cunt.
Edit #2:
dancinbutterfly's post about this chick can be found here. She addresses a lot of the things I didn't, and I highly recommend you check it out.
This post was brought to my attention recently, and I'm really having a hard time keeping my mouth shut. For those of you who can't be arsed into reading it, basically this woman, a radical feminist, claims that Firefly is anti-feminist and that Joss Whedon is a rapist.
I'm sure you're expecting me to be up in arms over her insulting Joss or something, but honestly, I couldn't care less about that aspect of it. What I take issue with is her definition of rape:
I believe in the radical feminist definition of rape. That is that men who pressure women into sex are rapists. That women who are pressured are not freely consenting and are therefore being raped. [...] I would argue that most 'sex' between men and women, in the contemporary 'sex-positive', pornographic, male-supremacist culture, is rape.
As someone who was violently raped when she was eight years old, I am offended at her definition of rape. If "Oh, honey, not tonight...well, okay," is considered rape, then we're going to have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me and what happens to millions of other women around the world.
I posted a response to her post, but she has her journal set to screen comments until she chooses to unscreen them, so I am posting my reply here on this journal as well because I am so...unbelievably offended and angry right now that I feel like I have to do something.
Please know that while I am a Joss Whedon fan, I am not making this comment as someone who is trying to defend his work. I am making this comment as someone who was raped when she was eight years old by her older brother.
I won't go into the details of what happened to me, but it was violent, it was against my will, and though I tried to stop it, I couldn't. It was the most helpless and, more importantly, hopeless that I have ever felt in my life. I wouldn't wish that feeling on anyone in this world, man, woman, or gender neutral.
What happened to me was rape.
Your definition of rape:
I believe in the radical feminist definition of rape. That is that men who pressure women into sex are rapists. That women who are pressured are not freely consenting and are therefore being raped. There have been a few discussions recently in the rad fem blogosphere debating whether all male initiated sex is rape, given that women are politically, socially and economically subordinate to men. So, in my understanding of Joss Whedon as a rapist is hinges on my definition of rape. I would argue that most 'sex' between men and women, in the contemporary 'sex-positive', pornographic, male-supremacist culture, is rape.
While I respect that you have the right to believe this, I have to say that as someone who was a rape victim, I am offended by it.
There is a very large difference between what happened to me and the things that happen to other rape victims that are even worse, and "No, honey, not tonight…well, all right." Do you see the difference?
What your definition of rape does is trivialize what happened to me and other victims around the world. If that is rape, then you'd have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me.
I'm not going to try and persuade you to change your mind, because it seems quite clear that you have formed your own opinions and don't intend to change, but as a victim of rape, I am appalled and offended at your definition of rape, and the subsequent trivialization of my experience that it causes.
I'm not trying to start drama or whatever, but as someone who was a victim of sexual assault, I feel like...like I have to say something to this girl, or no one else will.
And what's more, she's saying that any male/female sex is rape, just by definition. And that it is impossible for a woman to love a man without it being degradation.
Sorry, but that's bullshit.
And don't even get me started on how she claims that no white man can be in a relationship with a black woman without abusing her. Racist, much?
The real gem is when she insists that Joss's wife must only be staying around for the money or "patriarchal concepts of love," but money isn't as important as, "self-integrity, self-esteem, love (sister/lesbian/gynaffectionate love), etc." She's basically saying that the only valid love is between two women, and that male/female love doesn't exist.
It's women like her that give actual feminism--which is about equality, not man-hating--a bad name.
I'm sorry, I realize this post is long and preachy, but as someone who is a victim of rape, I am offended and enraged by her comments, and I couldn't not say something about it.
P.S. I'm making this post public, because I'm not going to be accused of hiding behind a friendslock. If someone wants to argue with me, then bring it.
Edit: Hahaha! Looks like someone isn't above lolcating this cunt.
Edit #2:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
i mean, i don't even know where to start arguing. when a person like that is just soooo fucking stupid and crazy, where's the common ground that you can start a dialogue on?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
You know I agree with what you wrote, and I think you did a really good job of arguing your point in your comment to her without being wanky, it was a mature and passionate response. Also, I'm glad you addressed this issue with the original poster personally as well. You have guts!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I agree with everything you're saying. Feminism is about equality, not hating men. People who think that are just as whacked as those who think men are somehow better.
Thumbs-up for this post. I hear you.
(no subject)
no subject
While I absolutely completely agree with your overall assessment of this person and her rants, I have to disagree that being talked into or verbally forced into having sex isn't horrible. It is not always within a long-term relationship ("No, honey, not tonight...") but can be by complete strangers, friends, or significant others. As someone who went through that herself, I do not label it "rape" since rape is defined (by Merriam Webster) as "to seize and take away by force; to despoil" and force usually implies physical force. However, that shouldn't devalue or take away from the legitimacy of wrongness involved in being verbally convinced to take part in something one really does not want any part in.
I do not think this woman has any basis for most of her arguments, but I did want to express my opinion on how strongly I feel about being used and hurt in a physical, emotional, and sexual capacity. Although I was never physically restrained, being verbally forced into having sex hurt, confused, and broke me.
Luckily, now, I have moved past that and am in a place where I can defend myself much better. I hope if the situation ever occurs again, I will be both physically and emotionally strong enough to fend off harmful events.
(no subject)
no subject
As for this woman? I wouldn't give her a second thought, she's obviously can turn anything into a "Why men suck, and poor women are being abused" argument. I mean, I haven't even gotten to the stuff about rape yet, and I think I have a headache from all the eye rolling I've done. She's just ridicuous!
The part that got me, that made me stop reading, was the bit about how Inara has no reason to become a prostitute, but must like the pretty clothes so puts up with being raped. And then she goes on to how she "services" the people on the ships emotional needs, and never gets paid for it (except from Kaylee, who is the only one who reciprocates). Because obviously, you should be paid for being a *friend* to the people around you. *head desk* Also:
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Joss uses his own wife in this way. Expects her to clean up his emotional messes.
Umm, because that's not what people do in relationships, you know, share emotional problems, and et comfort from loved ones....
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
You've got every right to be upset and offended. Fuck, I'm offended and I'm not of the majority who is being trivialized there.
"Radical feminism"? Oh please. People need to stop inventing shit just to justify their stupid bullshit.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Anyway, I cruised over to your journal to thank you for sharing a difficult part of yourself to make a point. I don't know if it will do any good for the OP, but perhaps some of the people who are agreeing with her will see it and think twice.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Thank you for calling her out on her privileged BS. Because that's what it is. Someone assuming they've got the sis-tah pow-ah that allows them to declare feminism is what they say it is. God.
(no subject)
no subject
Thanks for replying to her - people who cry 'rape' at absolutely everything really do women no favours.
(no subject)
no subject
I just wanted to thank you so, so much for what you said on that woman's journal. I reacted exactly the same way to her definition of rape, but couldn't bring myself to get into a flame war with her, particularly because -- much as I hate to say this -- I felt that, not having been a victim of rape, I didn't have any right to. You very eloquently said everything I wanted to say to a woman with a medieval arrow-slit for a brain, and I'm grateful for it. I'm so sorry for what you had to live through, but I want you to know how much I admire the fact that, in spite of that, you'll point out a vicious, irrational spew-fest for what it is. Frankly, you rock.
And I'm so sharing that macro with the world.
no subject
So thank you, for at least saying it in a way that made her unscreen it (she's now gone 'friend's only' reply to comments, so also thank you for writing it in time).
(no subject)
no subject
My point being that I seriously doubt she cares even slightly for the trivialization of textbook-definition rape her broad feminist generalized use of the word creates. There is clearly a certain type of human - many types, in fact - that she has absolutely no respect for, even on the most basic human level.