![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I haven't posted in a few days, but it wasn't because I was striking (I'm still not even sure what that whole thing is about). I just didn't have much to say. But I do now.
This post was brought to my attention recently, and I'm really having a hard time keeping my mouth shut. For those of you who can't be arsed into reading it, basically this woman, a radical feminist, claims that Firefly is anti-feminist and that Joss Whedon is a rapist.
I'm sure you're expecting me to be up in arms over her insulting Joss or something, but honestly, I couldn't care less about that aspect of it. What I take issue with is her definition of rape:
As someone who was violently raped when she was eight years old, I am offended at her definition of rape. If "Oh, honey, not tonight...well, okay," is considered rape, then we're going to have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me and what happens to millions of other women around the world.
I posted a response to her post, but she has her journal set to screen comments until she chooses to unscreen them, so I am posting my reply here on this journal as well because I am so...unbelievably offended and angry right now that I feel like I have to do something.
Please know that while I am a Joss Whedon fan, I am not making this comment as someone who is trying to defend his work. I am making this comment as someone who was raped when she was eight years old by her older brother.
I won't go into the details of what happened to me, but it was violent, it was against my will, and though I tried to stop it, I couldn't. It was the most helpless and, more importantly, hopeless that I have ever felt in my life. I wouldn't wish that feeling on anyone in this world, man, woman, or gender neutral.
What happened to me was rape.
Your definition of rape:
While I respect that you have the right to believe this, I have to say that as someone who was a rape victim, I am offended by it.
There is a very large difference between what happened to me and the things that happen to other rape victims that are even worse, and "No, honey, not tonight…well, all right." Do you see the difference?
What your definition of rape does is trivialize what happened to me and other victims around the world. If that is rape, then you'd have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me.
I'm not going to try and persuade you to change your mind, because it seems quite clear that you have formed your own opinions and don't intend to change, but as a victim of rape, I am appalled and offended at your definition of rape, and the subsequent trivialization of my experience that it causes.
I'm not trying to start drama or whatever, but as someone who was a victim of sexual assault, I feel like...like I have to say something to this girl, or no one else will.
And what's more, she's saying that any male/female sex is rape, just by definition. And that it is impossible for a woman to love a man without it being degradation.
Sorry, but that's bullshit.
And don't even get me started on how she claims that no white man can be in a relationship with a black woman without abusing her. Racist, much?
The real gem is when she insists that Joss's wife must only be staying around for the money or "patriarchal concepts of love," but money isn't as important as, "self-integrity, self-esteem, love (sister/lesbian/gynaffectionate love), etc." She's basically saying that the only valid love is between two women, and that male/female love doesn't exist.
It's women like her that give actual feminism--which is about equality, not man-hating--a bad name.
I'm sorry, I realize this post is long and preachy, but as someone who is a victim of rape, I am offended and enraged by her comments, and I couldn't not say something about it.
P.S. I'm making this post public, because I'm not going to be accused of hiding behind a friendslock. If someone wants to argue with me, then bring it.
Edit: Hahaha! Looks like someone isn't above lolcating this cunt.
Edit #2:
dancinbutterfly's post about this chick can be found here. She addresses a lot of the things I didn't, and I highly recommend you check it out.
This post was brought to my attention recently, and I'm really having a hard time keeping my mouth shut. For those of you who can't be arsed into reading it, basically this woman, a radical feminist, claims that Firefly is anti-feminist and that Joss Whedon is a rapist.
I'm sure you're expecting me to be up in arms over her insulting Joss or something, but honestly, I couldn't care less about that aspect of it. What I take issue with is her definition of rape:
I believe in the radical feminist definition of rape. That is that men who pressure women into sex are rapists. That women who are pressured are not freely consenting and are therefore being raped. [...] I would argue that most 'sex' between men and women, in the contemporary 'sex-positive', pornographic, male-supremacist culture, is rape.
As someone who was violently raped when she was eight years old, I am offended at her definition of rape. If "Oh, honey, not tonight...well, okay," is considered rape, then we're going to have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me and what happens to millions of other women around the world.
I posted a response to her post, but she has her journal set to screen comments until she chooses to unscreen them, so I am posting my reply here on this journal as well because I am so...unbelievably offended and angry right now that I feel like I have to do something.
Please know that while I am a Joss Whedon fan, I am not making this comment as someone who is trying to defend his work. I am making this comment as someone who was raped when she was eight years old by her older brother.
I won't go into the details of what happened to me, but it was violent, it was against my will, and though I tried to stop it, I couldn't. It was the most helpless and, more importantly, hopeless that I have ever felt in my life. I wouldn't wish that feeling on anyone in this world, man, woman, or gender neutral.
What happened to me was rape.
Your definition of rape:
I believe in the radical feminist definition of rape. That is that men who pressure women into sex are rapists. That women who are pressured are not freely consenting and are therefore being raped. There have been a few discussions recently in the rad fem blogosphere debating whether all male initiated sex is rape, given that women are politically, socially and economically subordinate to men. So, in my understanding of Joss Whedon as a rapist is hinges on my definition of rape. I would argue that most 'sex' between men and women, in the contemporary 'sex-positive', pornographic, male-supremacist culture, is rape.
While I respect that you have the right to believe this, I have to say that as someone who was a rape victim, I am offended by it.
There is a very large difference between what happened to me and the things that happen to other rape victims that are even worse, and "No, honey, not tonight…well, all right." Do you see the difference?
What your definition of rape does is trivialize what happened to me and other victims around the world. If that is rape, then you'd have to invent a whole new word for what happened to me.
I'm not going to try and persuade you to change your mind, because it seems quite clear that you have formed your own opinions and don't intend to change, but as a victim of rape, I am appalled and offended at your definition of rape, and the subsequent trivialization of my experience that it causes.
I'm not trying to start drama or whatever, but as someone who was a victim of sexual assault, I feel like...like I have to say something to this girl, or no one else will.
And what's more, she's saying that any male/female sex is rape, just by definition. And that it is impossible for a woman to love a man without it being degradation.
Sorry, but that's bullshit.
And don't even get me started on how she claims that no white man can be in a relationship with a black woman without abusing her. Racist, much?
The real gem is when she insists that Joss's wife must only be staying around for the money or "patriarchal concepts of love," but money isn't as important as, "self-integrity, self-esteem, love (sister/lesbian/gynaffectionate love), etc." She's basically saying that the only valid love is between two women, and that male/female love doesn't exist.
It's women like her that give actual feminism--which is about equality, not man-hating--a bad name.
I'm sorry, I realize this post is long and preachy, but as someone who is a victim of rape, I am offended and enraged by her comments, and I couldn't not say something about it.
P.S. I'm making this post public, because I'm not going to be accused of hiding behind a friendslock. If someone wants to argue with me, then bring it.
Edit: Hahaha! Looks like someone isn't above lolcating this cunt.
Edit #2:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 11:02 pm (UTC)I know. I mean, hey, I joke sometimes that I see everyone as inherently bisexual, but the truth of the matter is, heterosexuality is important for the procreation of the species. The human race needs male/female relationships to survive. We're biologically wired that way. So the only thing I can assume is that she's trying to say that most women are genetically wired to be rape victims, in which case she's belittling her entire gender. *eyeroll*
What I'm most proud of is that as a woman, I have choice. And if I choose to become like...a doctor, great. But if I choose to do something that wouldn't be considered "feminist," then that's fine, too, because it's my choice. Yes, in the real world, most women in prostitution would rather have a different job. But in Firefly's world, A) it's set in the future when things have changed and B) it's a whole different set of rules governing the relationship between Companion/Buyer. Inara's job is her choice, and it's one that she's damn proud of. Not only that, but in the "class system," out of the nine main characters, she's second only to Simon & River, who were born extremely wealthy. Companions are held in extremely high regard in this world, and it's Inara's choice to be one. If that's what she chooses, then more power to her, you know? Rock on, Inara. You rock the fuck on.
Mandi and I were joking that we were going to start an "equalist" movement complete with manifestos, mission statements, and a website. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 11:41 pm (UTC)I mean, hey, I joke sometimes that I see everyone as inherently bisexual, but the truth of the matter is, heterosexuality is important for the procreation of the species.
Yeah, I sometimes joke that homosexuality is Gods way of trying to stop our out of control birth rate, but we'd be in a really bad place were everyone homosexual.
Also, I was checking out metafandom, and I saw a link to this, something written by a friend of this chick, who is talking about how slash fanfic is evil and oppresses women, and this woman replied:
As to why women, gay, straight and bisexual, write slash fiction I think something I read recently really help clarify it for me. In anticlimax ,Sheila Jeffreys talked about a woman who, as a coping strategy for living with a violent, abusive husband, learnt to have orgasms whil being raped by her husband.
I think slash operates on the same principle. If women are going to be raped (metaphorically) by male supremecy day in and day out, when male supremacy is the air you breathe and the water you drink, then you learn to wring whatever pleasure you can from being raped. Slash is women wringing pleasure from their social and political powerlessness.
I just... *handwavey* what do you *say* to that? *God*.
Mandi and I were joking that we were going to start an "equalist" movement complete with manifestos, mission statements, and a website.
I know, I'm tracking the comments on this post, so had read it. I would totally be in on it :P Do we get badges? I want a badge!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 11:45 pm (UTC)Dude, I'm into slash because I find it hot, end of story. Sheesh! This chick is just...insane. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 04:34 pm (UTC)And I think that's a large part of where the confusion comes from. She just can't picture men being hot, so thinks we're trying to *control* our suffering by making it ours... or some crap like that. Whatever. They're all batshit crazy over there.
*pulls out special icon*
no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 01:58 am (UTC)Listen, allecto claims to be ANTI-SEX. how can you take that seriously?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 04:32 pm (UTC)Listen, allecto claims to be ANTI-SEX. how can you take that seriously?
They seem to be anti *everything*. The start off sounding, not too crazy, listing things like mysogeny, and prostitution, but move on to pronography of any kind and, wait for it, *marriage*. I hadn't read sex, but to be honest, I'm really not surprised. The fact that she thinks the majority of sex that occurs out there is rape (any male initiated sex, and heterosexual sex in general!) really makes me wonder how she can have any positive views on sex.